Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals


Islam’s world of unfettered sex: sex with dead spouses and animals; anal sex with women, men and animals…


MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

Muhammad had sex with a dead woman to qualify her for the perks of a prophetic wife.

According to Hadiths and Sayings of Prophet on issues of women in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and SLEPT with her in her coffin.”

The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali, his son-in-law. Commentators have offered differing views about the significance of Muhammad’s sleeping with the dead-body of Fatimah in her coffin, some emphasizing that it had no sexual side. But Arabic scholar Demetrius explains that to express Muhammad sleeping inside Fatima’s coffin with her dead-body, “The Arabic word used here is “Id’tajat”, which literally means “lay down to have sex.”

Muhammad is also understood to have said that because he slept with her, she has become like a wife to his; so she will be considered like “mother of the believers”.

After Muhammad slept with her and “consummated”, Medina women routinely offered themselves to Mohammad for sex so that the holy fluid of the prophet released into them will qualify them for paradise. Here is a hadith.

MUSLIM ARE ALLOWED “ANAL” SEX EVEN WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, Hadith 525:

“Our companions have said if a penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus or penile anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus, then it is necessary to wash…”

Watch the video below for more detailed discussion on this topic:-

NOW IT MAY AN EGYPTIAN LAW TOO

Egyptian husbands may be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives – for up to six hours after their death (sex performed after six hours will be considered adultery and the husband will be beheaded and buried with the wife)

This law is part of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament under ‘religious interpretations’. The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death (Al Arabiya News).

See cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari’s video, claiming Islamic justification of sex with dead bodies of spouses.

[SOURCE]

By :-  Sex & Sexuality in Islam

2 thoughts on “Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals

  1. What the fuck u talking about?the person who posted this is definitely a non muslim because in Islam anal sex is totally prohibited,and all the shit you saying is not Hadith and Hazrat Fatima(RA) was not the wife she was the daughter of HAZRAT MOHAMMAD(SAW).

    • THE LIE:

      OFFICIAL ISLAM

      HERE ARE THE MAJOR POINTS OF OFFICIAL ISLAM:

      ISLAM IS A RELIGION SIMILAR TO CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM. THEY ALL WORSHIP THE SAME GOD AND ARE OF THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH.

      GOOD MUSLIMS PROVE THAT ISLAM IS GOOD

      THERE ARE NO JIHADISTS, JUST EXTREMISTS FUELED BY POVERTY
      “EXTREMISTS” CAUSE THE VIOLENCE

      THE “BAD STUFF” IN THE KORAN IS DUE TO HOW IT IS INTERPRETED
      ISLAM MUST BE ACCOMMODATED IN AS MANY WAYS AS POSSIBLE

      ONE OF THE PROOFS OF ISLAM’S GREATNESS IS THE ISLAMIC GOLDEN AGE, THOUGHT BY SOME TO BE HUMANITY’S BEST DAYS

      VIOLENCE IS PERPETRATED BY MUSLIMS BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR AND
      ABUSED
      THE WEST RECEIVED THE FOUNDATION OF ITS INTELLECTUAL WORLD FROM ISLAM

      THE CRUSADES WERE A GREAT EVIL COMMITTED BY CHRISTIANS

      THERE ARE MOSTLY MODERATE MUSLIMS AND A FEW EXTREMIST MUSLIMS

      ISLAM IS ONLY FOUND IN THE KORAN

      GOOD MUSLIMS WILL REFORM THE “EXTREMISTS”

      ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF TOLERANCE

      ISLAM HAS A GOLDEN RULE

      ISLAM IS A WONDERFUL PART OF AMERICAN CULTURE

      ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF FREEDOM AND JUSTICE

      BUT THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF ISLAM IS A BIG LIE. THE FACT THAT THE OFFICIAL ISLAM DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE KORAN, SIRA AND HADITH IS OF NO IMPORTANCE, SINCE IT IS NOT BASED UPON THEM.

      OFFICIAL ISLAM IS BASED UPON THE PROPAGANDA
      OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. NOT ONE LINE OF THE OFFICIAL ISLAM IS
      TOTALLY TRUE AND MANY OF THE POINTS ARE COMPLETE FABRICATIONS.

      AT BEST, SOME ASSERTIONS ARE PARTIALLY TRUE. AHALF-TRUTH IS A LIE. WHEN YOU TESTIFY IN OUR COURTS YOU HAVE TO SWEAR AN OATH:

      “I SWEAR TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.”

      Official Islam is the Islam that the mainstream media, educators and government officials tell us is the “real” Islam. Official Islam is at best a half-truth and, as a result, it is false. It is important to not only know the truth of a subject, but it’s almost as important to know the common untruths.

      BUT THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF ISLAM IS A BIG LIE

      The fact that the Official Islam does not agree with the Koran, Sira and Hadith is of no importance, since it is not based upon them. Official Islam is based upon the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood. Not one line of the Official Islam is totally true and many of the points are complete fabrications.
      At best, some assertions are partially true. A half-truth is a lie. When you testify in our courts you have to swear an oath:

      “I swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”

      Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, 1971, pgs. 231, 232.
      All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true in itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

      The Official Islam is not the whole truth and as a consequence Official Islam is a lie.
      Official Islam is not provable and is delivered by “authorities”. This article is based upon critical/scientific thought. The Official Islam is based upon authoritarian thought—that is, you must believe it because those who have more power than you have say that it is true. Official Islam is a mind-set of denial and delusion and is the intellectual basis of the destruction of our civilization.

      Now you know why all of the arguments for Islam sound so uniform. The apologists for Islam get their scripts from the same source—the Muslim Brotherhood and its minions at the universities. In trying to persuade someone about Islam, it is very useful to be able to categorize their arguments. You can point out that what they say is part of a systemic lie. You can say: “if you believe that, then I am sure you also believe…” It is very disarming.

      Kafirs have a basic instinct when faced with Islam—let’s make some compromises. We will do things your way, Islam can reform and life will be good. This will not work and has never worked, but Kafirs refuse to be logical and study Islam to see why compromise won’t work.

      We must go through all of the steps of compromise to see why they will fail. In particular, we must see why reform is a logical impossibility. And last, but not least, we must see why the “good” Muslim cannot and will not help to achieve a solution.

      The elites tell us that Islam has always been part of one big happy human family. Islam is here and it is a wonderful thing. Islam is a foundational part of our civilization. Muslims make wonderful neighbors.

      The elites tell us that if we don’t get along with Political Islam, if we find a problem, then the problem is with us. The fact of the matter is that Mohammed attacked every single neighbor he had. His only success came through violence. His dying words were to hurt Jews, Christians and all Kafirs. Mohammed was Islam and he was never compatible with any Kafir. The Big Lie is just that. There is no way to live with Islam. Life with Islam is a succession of demands. Mohammed never stopped until 100% of his demands were met. That was life with Mohammed—the Sunna.

      Islam is a civilization that is designed to extinguish all Kafir civilizations down to their last cultural vestige. Annihilation is Sunna and the last 1400 years of history is proof of the brutal efficiency of Islamic politics. There has never been a culture where Islam and Kafirs existed in long-term peace. After a long enough time period, Islam takes over the total civilization. This is the goal of Islam.

      But since Kafirs don’t know anything about the history of Islam, they think that we will work this out like we always have. We will find a compromise. After all, in Kafir civilization, progress is made through teamwork and compromise. The first and crucial error is thinking that Islam is analogous to our civilization and that our rules apply to it. Let’s compare Islam with our civilization’s ideals.

      REFUTING OFFICIAL ISLAM
      Each and every point of Official Islam is at best a half-truth. Since every apologist believes these half-truths, it is very important to know how to refute the errors of Official Islam.

      HERE IS A POINT BY POINT REFUTATION

      THE RELIGION OF ISLAM IS SIMILAR TO CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM. THEY ALL WORSHIP THE SAME GOD.

      Islam is not only a religion, however, but a complete civilization with a political system of Sharia law and an Arab culture. It is the politics of Islam that are ruinous, not the religion.

      The Koran has 64% of its text devoted to the politics of the Kafir, not how to be a Muslim.

      The Sira (Mohammed’s biography) devotes 67% of its words to jihad. Religion plays very little part of the Sira. Mohammed was a failure until he turned to politics and jihad. Islam’s success depends upon its politics, even today.

      The religion of Islam is the invisibility cloak of Political Islam. People do not think of Islam as a political system, but a religion. You cannot criticize religion, so you cannot criticize Islam. This gets Political Islam off the hook.

      Both Christianity and Judaism have the Golden Rule as their central ethical principle.

      Islam does not have a Golden Rule, but instead has dualistic ethics with one set of rules for Muslims and another set for Kafirs.

      The Koran repeatedly says that the scriptures of the Jews and Christians are corrupt and filled with errors.

      The Koran defines Allah.

      The Hebrew Bible defines the Jewish god.

      Allah condemns, rails against and curses the Jews, but the god of the Hebrew Bible loves the Jews.

      The Christian god is defined by the New Testament and loves humanity.

      Allah does not love humanity, but hates the Kafirs (non-Muslims) and only loves Muslims.

      The Koran insists that Jesus was not divine, was not crucified and was not resurrected.

      The Koran says that the Christian Trinity is God, Mary and Jesus and then adds that there is no Trinity. The Koran rejects every principle of Christianity.

      The Jesus of the Koran is called Isa. Isa is not Jesus. And in the same way, the Musa of the Koran is not the Moses of the Torah. Every single “prophet” of the Koran that has a Jewish name is not actually the same prophet of the Torah.

      The concept of the commonality of Abrahamic faiths is purely an Islamic assertion, without evidence.

      Judaism and Christianity share the Hebrew Bible as being valid scripture.

      Islam denies the validity of the Hebrew Bible.

      GOOD MUSLIMS PROVE THAT ISLAM IS GOOD

      Muslims per se prove nothing about Islam. Islam is the doctrine found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. There is absolutely nothing that any Muslim can do about the doctrine of Islam, except to choose what part of it to follow. The word Islam means submission; the word Muslim refers to one who submits. This establishes cause and effect—Islam causes Muslims; Muslims do not cause Islam.

      Besides, what is a “good” Muslim? Kafirs mean that a good Muslim is someone who seems nice. But that is a subjective and personal standard. The only measure of “goodness” of a Muslim is the Koran and the Sunna. So even if the Muslim seems nice that proves not a single thing about the Koran, Sira and Hadith.
      It is faulty thinking to believe that everything that a Muslim does is pure Islam. Those who call themselves Muslims are also attracted to Kafir civilization. Few Muslims follow pure Islam. Muslims are also part Kafir and the goodness is due to their Kafir nature, not their Islamic nature. When Muslims are good to Kafirs they are following the Golden Rule, a Kafir ethic, not Islamic ethical dualism which asserts Muslims should not take Kafi rs as friends.

      THERE ARE NO JIHADISTS, JUST EXTREMISTS

      This naming is either pure dhimmitude or deceit. It is impossible to be an extremist if you are following the Sunna of Mohammed. Islam rose to power through continued violence for nine straight years with an act of violence, on the average, of every six weeks. The act of jihad is not ex¬tremism, but a manifestation of the core political doctrine of Islam. Put another way, none of the jihadists on 9/11 were extremists, but were ex¬traordinary Muslims who followed the Sunna of Mohammed.
      refuting official islam

      ISLAM MUST BE ACCOMMODATED IN AS MANY WAYS AS POSSIBLE

      This is dhimmitude (serving the needs of Islam) based upon ignorance and fear. Any student of Islamic history can show that Islam is never accommodated until the host culture follows Sharia. Mohammed was not satisfied until every person in Arabia submitted to Islam.
      Accommodation of Islam means the end of free speech, free thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press and our civilization.

      ONE OF THE PROOFS OF ISLAM’S GREATNESS THAT MUSLIMS OFFER IS THE ISLAMIC GOLDEN AGE, HUMANITY’S BEST DAYS

      Golden age?

      It is important to understand the true Islamic Golden Age as it such a popular argument about the greatness of the intellectual power of Islam. The Golden Age is part of Official Islam and is taqiyya (deception).

      The Islamic Golden Age occured in two places—Moorish Spain and Baghdad in the ninth and tenth century. The oft-told Big Lie goes like this: Islam established a paradise on earth where Christians, Jews and Muslims lived in peace. Everybody got along. People were wealthy and knowledge flowed from the Islamic scholars in an unprecedented wave. While Europe was in the Dark Ages, Islam was a light unto the world. The only way that Europeans moved out of the Dark Ages was through the charity of Islamic knowledge.

      That is the short version told by our dhimmi professors in such works as The Oxford History of Islam. Let us examine the Islamic Golden Age.

      FIRST THINGS FIRST

      Islam invaded Baghdad and Spain with the sword in hand. Islam killed so many people that the remainder surrendered. Those who surrendered and did not convert were raped, robbed and made dhimmis, except for those who were made slaves and shipped to another part of the Islamic empire. How Golden a beginning is that?

      The Muslim masters were the new rulers who put Sharia law in place. What was the level of learning of the Muslims when they set up Baghdad as the imperial city? Islam was only a century away from Mohammed. There had never been a book written in Arabic until the Koran. Architecture consisted of mud huts. Arabia was barely out of the Bronze Age. Superstition ruled and the “science” of Mohammed as shown in the Hadith:

      •The first men were 90 feet tall.
      •One wing of a fly carries a disease, but the other wing is a cure for the disease.
      •Black cumin will cure all diseases except death.
      •Indian incense will cure seven diseases.
      •Honey will cure diarrhea.
      •A fever is caused by the heat from Hell.
      •The sun sets at night beneath the throne of Allah.

      This was the state of Islamic knowledge when Islam conquered Baghdad in the Christian nation of what is now Iraq. In short, Islam brought nothing to the intellectual table to start the Golden Age.

      The knowledge of the Golden Age in Baghdad came from the conquered Jews, Christians, Persians, and Hindus.

      Islam took the “Arabic” numerals and the zero from the Hindus.

      The parabolic arch came from Assyria, the dome from Persia, and the barrel vault came from the Romans.

      Suddenly, the ignorant jihadists “owned” the world’s finest minds. This explains how so much of the Islamic knowledge was actually translated into Arabic by Christians.

      O’Leary’s book How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs gives a list of the best known scholars of the Baghdad (Abbasid caliphate) Golden Age. Out of theses 22 “Muslim” scholars, 20 were Christian, 1 was Persian and 1 was Muslim. Each and everyone had an Arabic name, so it is assumed that they were Muslim.

      It was the Christians Assyrians who translated the Greek philosophers into Syriac and then Arabic. It had to be this way. The Christians had a long tradition of education and learning that came from the Greeks, Jews and Romans; the Muslims had none. It had to be Christian Kafirs who brought over the Greek and Roman knowledge to the Muslims. Ironically, the Muslims claim all of the credit for the translations saving Greek knowledge from the Dark Ages.

      Another example of taking credit is found in Iraqi history texts which claim that the Assyrians, Sumerians, and Babylonians were all Arabs. This allows Islam to take credit for earlier work.

      Islam makes great claims for its advanced medicine, which was the best in the West. However, the Christians and Jews were the chief practitioners. For 200 years the Bakhtishu family, Assyrian Christians, were the physicians to the Caliphs of Baghdad.
      The Baghdad Golden Age disappeared as the persecution of the Christian dhimmis continued, and they converted to Islam. Once the pool of Kafir talent became Muslims, the gold went out of the Golden Age.

      The Golden Age of Spain is much of the same. Let’s examine the perfect society of Christian, Jew and Muslim living in such harmony. Moorish Spain is portrayed as the high point of multi-cultural existence that is the perfect expression of Islamic society. Islam came to Spain by the sword. That invasion started an 800-year war with the Christians fighting against the constant Islamic invasion pressure at the border between Spain and Europe. Why does a struggle of 800 years not sound Golden? If Islamic Spain was such a Golden Age, then why did the Spanish die in furious battles to throw out the Muslims?

      Why is Islamic imperialism painted as such a beautiful thing?

      At this point it may seem as if there were no Islamic intellectual work that was of any value. This is not true, but the Golden Age propaganda is so strong, that a case must be established that the Golden Age was not what is portrayed—a proof of Islam’s wonderful multicultural paradise and superior intellectual achievements.

      But even the Muslim scholars had to contend with an intellectual world that was limited by the Koran and the Sunna. No thoughts were allowed that went beyond these small and strict bounds. Averroes was one of the best-known scholars of Moorish Spain and was very influential with both Christians and Jews. His writings were not Islamic enough and he was banished until shortly before his death. Many of his writings were burned. No school of Islamic school of thought followed him. Only Europeans honored his intelligence.

      Al Farabi was a Muslim thinker of the first rank and used Greek reasoning to conclude that logical thought was superior to revelation, an Islamic heresy. He used critical thought examining the Koran and rejected predestination. He illustrates the idea that the best Muslim scholars were part Kafir.

      Al Khwarzimi was an Islamic scholar in mathematics and astronomy. His translated works introduced Hindu mathematics to Kafirs. His work was the basis of algebra and the algorithm.

      The more basic question is why do Muslims do so poorly at intellectual work? Even during the Golden Age, their output was small and depended upon Kafirs. In the modern world, Muslims have never won a single Nobel Prize in science, medicine or chemistry by themselves. There have been 8 prizes won by Muslims who worked with Kafirs in Kafir countries. But there has never been a Noble Prize for Muslim ideas.

      Yes, there are Muslim thinkers who can produce good intellectual work, but they are outstanding individuals and are not at all typical. Saudi Arabia is the purest Islamic country and has untold billions to support any project they choose. In 2003 there were only 171 patents granted to Saudis1; compare this with 16,328 patents by South Korea2. Why is this?
      1 Arab Human Development Report 2003: Building a Knowledge Society, UN Publications, 2003, pg. 11.
      2 ibid

      This is not a modern phenomenon. It goes back 1400 years. The only explanation lies with the nature of Islam itself.
      There is one more thing to notice about what Islam produced with the Kafir knowledge. Some of their best work was in math, but it never went anywhere practically. Al Khwarzimi may have developed the algo¬rithm, but it was Kafirs who put it to use in computers. Algebra was only an idea in a book; it was a Kafir, Sir Isaac Newton, who used algebra to develop calculus and differential equations. And with calculus and dif¬ferential equations, Newton was able to show how the planets moved in orbit. Muslims used glass for windows in their mosques. Kafirs used it in telescopes and microscopes.

      THE FINAL WORD

      The basic problem with the Golden Age is the status of the Kafirs. They were dhimmis, third class citizens without civil rights.

      The Islamic ethical basis of the Golden Age was dualism—one set of ethics for Muslims and another set for Kafi rs. Kafirs had to wear special clothing, were prohibited from being in positions of power, had to get permission to repair houses of worship and could not testify in courts against a Muslim. If a Kafir killed a Muslim, he received a death sentence, but if a Muslim killed a Kafir, he paid a fine. A Kafir was inferior in every way to a Muslim. How Golden is that?

      Every Kafir lived under Sharia law and Sharia law is based upon the evil of the principles of submission and duality. Sharia is oppressive and cruel.
      Where did all this propaganda about the Golden Age come from? Two sets of people created the Golden Age myth—French intellectuals such as Voltaire, and the Jews. Both had the same motivation—hatred of the Catholic church. Building up the wonderful Islamic culture was to contrast how bad the Catholics were.
      There were Kafirs who prospered under Islam. They submitted and served Islam and their masters rewarded them. Every occupying army can persuade some locals to act as traitors their own for personal gain. Some of these Kafirs even had positions of some power, but in the end, they were servants of Islam.

      VIOLENCE BY MUSLIMS IS DUE TO THEIR BEING POOR AND OPPRESSED

      This explanation works best if you are a Marxist of some fl avor who believes that economics and materialism is the driver for human behavior. Anyone who has studied Islamic doctrine and history knows that Islam is based upon violence and that without violence Mohammed would have died a failure. Jihad by terror and violence, was his best invention and was the reason for his success in Medina. In Mecca he tried religion as a basis for success and failed.

      Violence by Muslims against Kafirs is pure Islamic doctrine.

      THE WEST GOT THE BASIS OF ITS INTELLECTUAL WORLD FROM ISLAM

      This is another version of the Golden Age of Islam was humanity’s best days. When Islam destroyed the Greek culture of Anatolia and the Mediterranean, many of the surviving Greek and Roman texts were translated by Arabic Christians into Arabic. Later when Europe began to recover from the destruction of the Roman Empire by barbarians and the destruction of the Byzantine Empire by Islam, the Arabic translations became part of the recovery process.

      So as a result of the destruction of Greek culture and the preservation of the texts by Christian Arabs, Islam gets credit for saving European culture. Imagine that you had a valuable art collection that was stolen. Then the thieves burned your house. Afterwards, the police recovered your stolen art. Should the thieves get credit for the preservation of your art?

      THE CRUSADES WERE A GREAT EVIL

      The Christians of Europe committed some grievous errors in the Crusades. The worst mistake was attacking Constantinople and fatally weakening the Greek Byzantine Empire. This attack led to Islam’s success in conquering the Greek Byzantines, one of humanity’s great tragedies.

      Another dreadful error was the killing of thousands of Jews on the way to Jerusalem. Persecution of Jews occurred on more than one Crusade.

      Having said that, it was one of the few times that European Christians came to the aid of their tortured Orthodox Christian brothers. Remember—the Crusades were defensive warfare. Islam invaded and conquered the Christians of the Middle East. When the Orthodox Christians cried out for help, the European Christians responded. Since that time, the Christians have steadfastly ignored the suffering of their Orthodox brothers.

      THERE ARE MODERATE MUSLIMS AND A FEW EXTREMIST MUSLIMS

      This is a perfect example of making statements about Islam based upon the Golden Rule and ignorance (or deceit) about the doctrine and history of Islam.

      The only scale for measuring Muslims is Islam, not our ethics. Only the Koran and the Sunna give us the scale to measure a Muslim. Any Muslim that follows the doctrine of either Meccan Islam or Medinan Islam is a moderate. Medinan Muslims (jihadists) are moderates, just like Meccan Muslims are moderates.

      The only extremist Muslim is an apostate, since apostasy is the “extreme” in Islam that is condemned.

      ISLAM IS FOUND IN THE KORAN (MOHAMMED IS NEVER DISCUSSED)

      This is the grand error of Official Islam. Once you know Mohammed, you know Islam. Once you know Mohammed, you know you are a Kafir and it is the purpose of Islam to annihilate you and your culture.

      Therefore, it is the prime directive of Official Islam to never mention Mohammed, the Sunna and Sharia and only talk about the Koran, the book everybody has heard of and nobody has read (and is considered impossible to understand). Sheer belief in the profound nature of the Koran is superstitious behavior.

      If someone tries to explain Islam based upon the Koran, he knows very little about this subject. Immediately shift the conversation to Sharia and Mohammed. You can’t defeat Islam using the Koran, unless you are very skillful, but anyone can use Sharia and Mohammed and make major ideological points easily.

      Of the three Islamic texts—Koran, Sira and Hadith—the Koran is about 16% of the total content of the doctrine. Islam is 84% Mohammed and 16% Koran. To know Islam, know Mohammed.

      Notice the brilliance of moving the Kafirs’ attention to the Koran, not the Sunna. The conventional wisdom is that you have to understand the Koran to understand Islam. That is what our generation has been taught refuting official islam in our schools. It used to be that the word Islam was not used, but instead was called Mohammedanism. That name points to truth and to Mohammed. But everybody looks to the book they cannot understand, the Koran.

      Yet, what you need to know Mohammed in order to understand Islam. The Koran has been made impossible to understand without Mohammed. Most of the educated Kafi rs never think about Mohammed, they are left ignorant and believing whatever Muslims say.

      THE “BAD STUFF” IN THE KORAN IS JUST HOW IT IS INTERPRETED

      Luckily all of the bad stuff in the Koran has been interpreted in the Sharia, we don’t need to worry about interpretation. The Sharia says that the verses about fighting in Allah’s cause means killing Kafirs.

      There is no “bad stuff” in the Koran. The Koran is crystal clear in its nature. The fact that violence is repeatedly preached in the Koran does not make the Koran bad.

      Everything is the Koran is pure Islamic goodness. Jihad is part of that Islamic goodness.
      Indeed, the entire concept of “good” and “bad” is un-Islamic. In contrast, Islam is based upon what is permitted and not permitted.

      GOOD MUSLIMS WILL REFORM THE “EXTREMISTS”

      As long as they are following the Sunna, a Muslim is a “good” Muslim. But extremists are merely Medinan Muslims, since they follow the Medinan doctrine of jihad. Extremists are jihadists. Jihadists are the best Muslims and don’t need reform. Indeed, the Koran gives the jihadists political power over the Meccan Muslims, the ones we call good Muslims. Meccan Muslims are subordinate to Medinan Muslims, so the only reform can only come from Medinan Muslims, not the other way around.

      ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF TOLERANCE

      This is Sunna: when Mohammed became a prophet of Allah there were 360 religions in Mecca and were practiced around the Kabah. The Arabs were a very tolerant people. There had never been a religious war in Arabia until Mohammed.

      After Mohammed came torture, murder, assassinations, enslavement, rape, theft and deceit. After 23 years of Mohammed, there were no other religions tolerated in Arabia. Mohammed was absolutely intolerant of all Kafirs. Mohammed was one of the most intolerant men who ever lived; therefore, Islam is one of the most intolerant political systems in history.

      ISLAM HAS A GOLDEN RULE

      Show me the Islamic Golden Rule. It is not found in the Koran, the Sira or the Hadith. The very concept of “Kafir” means that the Golden Rule cannot exist. There is no Golden Rule in Islam, since it divides humanity into two equal groups—believer and Kafir.
      After Mohammed became a prophet of Allah, he attacked everyone who did not agree with him. He kept attacking, first verbally and then physically, until everyone agreed to do exactly what he said. That is not the Golden Rule, but it is the Sunna. Mohammed did not follow the Golden Rule, therefore, it is not Sunna, and it is not Islam.

      ISLAM IS A WONDERFUL PART OF AMERICAN CULTURE

      American culture is founded on the moral principle of the Golden Rule and the intellectual principle of critical thought. The Golden Rule is manifest in our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. We have full legal equality of sex, race, religion and freedom of thought, ideas and the media.

      Islam denies all of these principles with its dualistic ethics and dualistic logic. It is Islam’s desire to eliminate all of our civilization and it is not part of it, whatsoever. It is not possible for dualism to be a part of our civilization, since it denies our core values.

      ISLAM IS THE RELIGION OF FREEDOM

      This is an insult to Islam, since it is the civilization of slaves. Mohammed was a slave of Allah. Muslims are the slaves of Allah. Mohammed enslaved those who did not agree with what he said. Every Muslim is a slave to the Sharia. Freedom is an anathema in Islam.
      To leave Islam is a death sentence. Apostasy is the worst crime in Islam. If you cannot leave Islam, how is it free?

      Once you know the actual doctrine of Islam, it is easy to refute Official Islam, the Big Lie. You probably will never use all of these arguments at the same time, but each of them can come up at any discussion of Islam since the government, religious leaders, professors and media types all push this propaganda.

      A CASE STUDY

      Here is a typical comment from a religious leader in response to a letter in a paper that was critical of Islam:

      We find otherwise good people become bigots when they discuss Islam.
      They judge Islam by its extremists. Unfortunately, Islamophobia is the last remaining acceptable prejudice.

      When they say that Islam abuses women, murders apostates and hates outsiders, they are talking about a counterfeit Islam. We find such hatred amongst both Jews and Christians as well.

      One Muslim writer pointed out that there is enough in the Koran for global holy war. But there is also enough there for people of a peaceful mind-set to discover a path to enlightenment and peace. There is bad material in the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament as well. But we can also find sublime uplifting passages.
      Our spiritual work, as brothers of the Abrahamic faith, is to combat ugly anti-Muslim sentiments and make it socially intolerable.
      Signed: Rabbi …

      THE RESPONSE

      Let us start with an analysis of content.

      Here are some major points:

      •There is not one mention of Mohammed or Allah (Koran)
      •Bigots judge Islam by its extremists (what is an extremist? No scale to measure extremism is given)
      •Being critical of Islam is prejudiced
      •Denies that Islam abuses women, murders apostates and hates outsiders
      •Calls Muslims who do such—counterfeit (what is the reference to determine the truth? If something is false, how do we determine what is true or false. We must have a standard.)
      •Who is the “one Muslim writer” and why do we care?
      •There are good verses and bad verses in the Koran, but there is good stuff and bad stuff in the Bible
      •Jews, Christians, and Muslims are part of the same Abrahamic faith
      •In the last paragraph we are now hating people (not Islam)
      •People who speak against Islam must be driven out of society
      •Who is this man to make such moral judgments?

      There are many points to attack. Here is one reply that tackles most of these points. Notice that even though the writer is a rabbi, it makes no difference; he could be a Christian or any other dhimmi.

      FIRST THINGS FIRST

      There is not one single fact about Islam in the entire letter. We know this because anything that relates to the doctrine of Islam includes the words: Allah or Mohammed. Instead of facts, the writer substitutes his authoritarian reasoning and the opinion of “one Muslim writer”, not Mohammed. He declares from his high moral ground the judgment that anyone who criticizes Islam is a bigot. Why? He decrees it. Evidence? Facts? No need for those when you have the authority to make decrees.

      THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT COUNTERFEIT ISLAM

      He uses the word “counterfeit”. And what is the standard to determine counterfeit from the real deal? Simple, the one and only standard of Islam is the Koran and the Sunna. Let’s use that standard.

      WHEN THEY SAY THAT ISLAM ABUSES WOMEN

      For those who enjoy fact-based logic: Does Islam abuse women?

      Let’s start with the Koran:

      Koran 4:34 Allah has made men superior to women because men spend their wealth to support them. Therefore, virtuous women are obedient, and they are to guard their unseen parts as Allah has guarded them. As for women whom you fear will rebel, admonish them first, and then send them to a separate bed, and then beat them. But if they are obedient after that, then do nothing further; surely Allah is exalted and great!

      Now let us turn to Mohammed as found the Hadith (Mohammed’s traditions). Mohammed’s words and actions (Sunna) are half of Islam.

      If Mohammed did it, then it not extremist, by definition.

      Abu Dawud 11, 2142 Mohammed said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.

      THIS HADITH EQUATES CAMELS, SLAVES AND WOMEN

      Abu Dawud 11, 2155 Mohammed said: If one of you marries a woman or buys a slave, he should say: “O Allah, I ask You for the good in her, and in the disposition You have given her; I take refuge in You from the evil in her, and in the disposition You have given her.” When he buys a camel, he should take hold of the top of its hump and say the same kind of thing.

      Here is more advice about slaves and women:

      Bukhari 7,62,132 The Prophet said, “None of you should flog his wife as he flogs a slave and then have sexual intercourse with her in the last part of the day.”

      EQUALITY OF SEXES IN HADITH

      MURDER OF APOSTATES

      Does Islam murder apostates (those who leave Islam)? Let us ask what the Sunna of Mohammed says:

      Bukhari 9, 83, 37 […] This news reached Allah’s Apostle , so he sent (men) to follow their traces and they were captured and brought (to the Prophet). He then ordered to cut their hands and feet, and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, and then he threw them in the sun till they died.” I said, “What can be worse than what those people did? They deserted Islam, commit¬ted murder and theft.”

      Bukhari 9, 84, 57 […] I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”

      Bukhari 9, 84, 58 […] Behold: There was a fettered man be¬side Abu Muisa. Mu’adh asked, “Who is this (man)?” Abu Muisa said, “He was a Jew and became a Muslim and then reverted back to Judaism.” Then Abu Muisa requested Mu’adh to sit down but Mu’adh said, “I will not sit down till he has been killed. This is the judgment of Allah and His Apostle (for such cases) and repeated it thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered that the man be killed, and he was killed. […]

      It is Sunna to kill apostates, so Islamic doctrine says to kill apostates. As an aside, when Mohammed, died the next caliph, Abu Bakr, killed apostates for two years because many Muslims wanted to quit. Abu Bakr persuaded the survivors to be contented Muslims.

      HATE OUTSIDERS

      Does Islam hate outsiders? Let us turn to the Koran and consider a word introduced and defined by the Koran. The word is Kafi r (unbeliever), the ultimate outsider. More that half of the Koran is about Kafi rs. The only good verses about Kafirs are abrogated later in the Koran. Allah hates Kafirs and plots against them.

      Koran 40:35 They who dispute the signs of Allah [Kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Al¬lah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart.

      Koran 86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafi rs and leave them alone for a while.
      Kafirs can be tortured, mocked, robbed, enslaved and raped. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.

      The Kafir argument may be carried further with more details. Make a list of what Mohammed did to all of his Kafi r neighbors.

      The rabbi grapples with the duality of the Koran in his paragraph about the good and the bad in the Koran. He makes the usual argument about “it all depends on the interpretation.” This drive for interpretation is an attempt to eliminate the contradictory nature of the Koran. The Ko¬ran is filled with contradictions at all levels, and this was pointed out to Mohammed by the Meccans of his day. The Koran uses the principle of abrogation to resolve these contradictions. The later verse is better than the earlier verse.
      But since everything in the Koran is the exact word of Allah and Allah is perfect and cannot lie, then every verse of the Koran is true, even if it is contradictory. This violates our logic so we try to decide which side is the truth. But both sides are true in dualistic logic. The Koran is dualistic document and Islam is a dualistic ideology. The answer to the question: “which side is it?” is always—all of the above. That is the genius of Islam. It can have it both ways, and this confuses the Kafirs.

      AS BROTHERS OF THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH

      Now to the idea of: “brothers in the Abrahamic faith.” Let us look to Mohammed for the relationship between Muslims and their Jewish brothers. At first, Mohammed proved his validity by the fact that his angel was Gabriel, the angel of the prophets of the Jews. Therefore, he was of the same prophetic linage. Since there were no Jews in Mecca to deny him, the idea worked.

      When he went to Medina, which was half Jewish, the rabbis told him he was no prophet in the lineage of the Jews. No one could contradict Mohammed and as a result, three years later, there was not a single Jew left in Medina. They were annihilated. Then he attacked the Jews of Khaybar and made them dhimmis after he had killed, tortured, raped and robbed them. On his deathbed he condemned the Jews and Christians to be banished from Arabia. There are no Jews in Arabia today.

      That is the Sunna. That is Islam. And that is the way Islam has treated the Jews and Christians ever since—as dhimmis. Dhimmis are Kafirs who serve Islam by submitting and laboring for Islam. If the dhimmi is subservient enough, Islam will be kind. There are no brothers of Abraham. Just dhimmis to Mohammed!

      The root of the Israel problem is that Israel refuses to act like dhimmis.

      This argument about the falseness of the Abrahamic brotherhood of Jews, Christians and Muslims is attacked by the Sunna. Another attack is to point out that a Jew or Christian is not a “real” Jew or Christian until they meet Islam’s criteria. Jews must admit that the Torah is corrupt and all of the stories about Moses, David, Noah and the rest are wrong. Then Jews must accept Mohammed as the last of the Jewish prophets. Christians must deny the divinity of Jesus, His crucifixion and resurrection. Christians must also admit that the Gospels are wrong and that Mohammed is the final prophet to the Christians.
      If the writer were a Christian, then the Sunna would be about how Mohammed attacked and killed Christians and made them dhimmis.

      Here is the place to make the argument that in fact, the rabbi and the person who he claims is a bigot, have something in common. They are both Kafirs. Of course, the rabbi is a dhimmi as well, but notice that the word is never applied to him directly. Be careful to avoid name calling, even dhimmi. Be that as it may, both are Kafirs and are not Muslims. This has consequences. If there is any brotherhood to be had, it is between Kafirs, not between Jews (or Christians) and Muslims.

      COMBAT UGLY ANTI-MUSLIM SENTIMENTS AND MAKE IT SOCIALLY INTOLERABLE

      We need to address one last bit of sophistry. The writer subtly shifts the argument about Islam to Muslims. Muslims are people and as such vary. There are 1.5 billion varieties of Muslims, but only one source of Islam. We need to stick to the study of Islam and leave Muslims out of it.

      Making it socially intolerable to criticize Islam is pure social tyranny. He rejects critical thought and calls on the authorities of a fascist state to suppress ideas he does not like. Who is the true bigot?

      It would seem that before a spiritual leader takes on the task of calling those who use critical thought bigots, his better task would be to seek the truth of Islamic ideology. The truth of Islam is found in the Koran, the Sunna (Sira and Hadith) and Islam’s political history. As a spiritual leader, once you have mastered those texts, and then speak to the issue. Until then, he should play the role of the student and stop referring to those with knowledge as bigots.

      Conclusion
      This has been an exercise in fact-based rational thought; compare it to the writer’s authoritarian thought and his groundless assertions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s